James M Driskill
IF YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH... you will engage forward ---- OTHERWISE if you suppose HATERS and CONSPIRACY and CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH --- you will IGNORE this -- OR WORST --- BLOCK ME FOR NO REASON.
AUDIO: About Standards and the "Fuck" Word --- no reason to ignore this....
http://webdomains.fuckeduphuman.net/dbh.sbcounty.gov/Blocking-Is-The-Haters-Way-Lets-Have-A-Discussion-About-Truth-1.ogg
AUDIO: About Standards and the "Fuck" Word --- no reason to ignore this....
http://webdomains.fuckeduphuman.net/dbh.sbcounty.gov/Blocking-Is-The-Haters-Way-Lets-Have-A-Discussion-About-Truth-1.ogg
Oct 31, 2020 2:26:58pm
James M Driskill
IF YOU CAN HAND
Oct 31, 2020 2:25:12pm
James M Driskill
Do I need to REPOST the CONTENT?
Oct 31, 2020 1:10:55pm
James M Driskill
Oct 31, 2020 1:09:54pm
James M Driskill
What happened to the TWO HANDS Shaking here?
Oct 31, 2020 1:09:53pm
James M Driskill
JOIN IN THIS DISQUS! DISCUSSION AREA PLEASE:
https://npino.com/social-worker/1902211774-ms.-veronica-lynn-kelley/
https://npino.com/social-worker/1902211774-ms.-veronica-lynn-kelley/
Oct 31, 2020 1:08:34pm
James M Driskill
That is an OFFICAL EMOJI BRAND Graphic.
Oct 31, 2020 1:07:16pm
James M Driskill
Oct 31, 2020 1:06:48pm
James M Driskill
Oct 31, 2020 1:05:36pm
James M Driskill
Oct 31, 2020 1:04:46pm
James M Driskill
Oct 31, 2020 1:04:17pm
James M Driskill
Will you JOIN ME in a FORUM area SETUP by the DISQUS! Took on NPINO Records for this Person -- The Director of the Department of Behavioral Health who is CONTINUING THIS CONSPIRACY -- DENYING my RIGHTS
Oct 31, 2020 1:04:16pm
James M Driskill
Oct 31, 2020 1:01:36pm
James M Driskill
You cannot BLOCK this CONVERSATION LEGALLY or ETHICALY.
Oct 31, 2020 1:00:20pm
James M Driskill
https://knightcolumbia.org/content/social-media-for-public-officials-101
2. Don’t block users or delete comments just because they criticize you.
If you use your account as an extension of your office, the First Amendment prohibits you from blocking people from the account—or suppressing or deleting their comments, or otherwise penalizing them—because of their viewpoints.
Multiple courts have held that social media accounts used for official purposes are “public forums” within the meaning of the First Amendment. A “public forum” is established when the government invites members of the public to speak in a space that the government owns or controls. Courts have held that the interactive features of social media accounts used for official purposes make those accounts public forums for First Amendment purposes because they enable members of the public to speak by, for example, replying to tweets or posting comments.
While there are different kinds of forums—including public forums in which all topics and speakers are allowed, and “limited” public forums, in which the government restricts which speakers can participate or which topics can be addressed—one rule that applies to all First Amendment forums is that the government may not stop people from speaking in them on the basis of their viewpoints. The rule against viewpoint discrimination ensures that people aren’t excluded from public discourse simply because their views are controversial or disagreeable to others. It also helps ensure that government officials don’t insulate themselves from the opinions of the people whom they are supposed to represent.
2. Don’t block users or delete comments just because they criticize you.
If you use your account as an extension of your office, the First Amendment prohibits you from blocking people from the account—or suppressing or deleting their comments, or otherwise penalizing them—because of their viewpoints.
Multiple courts have held that social media accounts used for official purposes are “public forums” within the meaning of the First Amendment. A “public forum” is established when the government invites members of the public to speak in a space that the government owns or controls. Courts have held that the interactive features of social media accounts used for official purposes make those accounts public forums for First Amendment purposes because they enable members of the public to speak by, for example, replying to tweets or posting comments.
While there are different kinds of forums—including public forums in which all topics and speakers are allowed, and “limited” public forums, in which the government restricts which speakers can participate or which topics can be addressed—one rule that applies to all First Amendment forums is that the government may not stop people from speaking in them on the basis of their viewpoints. The rule against viewpoint discrimination ensures that people aren’t excluded from public discourse simply because their views are controversial or disagreeable to others. It also helps ensure that government officials don’t insulate themselves from the opinions of the people whom they are supposed to represent.
Oct 31, 2020 12:59:56pm
James M Driskill
[ That was a SELECTION MENU of your DESIGN ] --- That means chat is an option --- but you will also deny this chat conversation with me? Why?
Oct 31, 2020 12:59:34pm
James M Driskill
Are you available to chat?
Oct 31, 2020 12:58:32pm